Ken Ham: Why respond to the book when you can respond to the book review?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Ken Ham: Why respond to the book when you can respond to the book review?

Post  danquixote on Wed Aug 10, 2011 5:28 pm

Found this on Killing The Buddha, In which author Brook Wilensky-Lanford responds Ken Ham's allegation that she didn't do sufficient research for her book Paradise Lust because the review in the Wall Street Journal didn't explain why his Creation Museum believes the Garden of Eden doesn't exist any more. Despite the fact that the issue is thoroughly addressed in the book.

Best quote: "If the review were to give a full explanation of each of the ideas in my book, it would also be 304 pages long."

danquixote

Posts : 3
Join date : 2010-01-29

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum