Ken Ham: Why respond to the book when you can respond to the book review?

Found this on Killing The Buddha, In which author Brook Wilensky-Lanford responds Ken Ham's allegation that she didn't do sufficient research for her book Paradise Lust because the review in the Wall Street Journal didn't explain why his Creation Museum believes the Garden of Eden doesn't exist any more. Despite the fact that the issue is thoroughly addressed in the book.

Best quote: "If the review were to give a full explanation of each of the ideas in my book, it would also be 304 pages long."